32dbn9pkkn971.jpg -

: List what worked well. Was the experience positive, or was the visual data easy to interpret?.

: Briefly explain the goal of the review—whether it is to evaluate technical quality, artistic merit, or informational accuracy. 2. Critical Analysis 32dbn9pkkn971.jpg

: Identify shortcomings or "gaps" where the content failed to provide a full picture or had technical flaws. 4. Conclusion & Rating : List what worked well

: For an image, discuss the composition, clarity, and technical execution. Note if it adheres to standard specifications like color, dimension, and file quality. discuss the composition